Re: UDI issues

Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH (allbery@kf8nh.apk.net)
Sat, 19 Sep 1998 09:10:16 -0300


In message <Pine.LNX.3.96.980918234137.539A-100000@fire.fireplace>, Gerhard
Mac
k writes:
+-----
| This isn't us vs the other Unix people.
| This isn't us vs the harware maufacturers.
| This is us vs Microsoft...
+--->8

For now.

Linux is an ally of convenience for the Unix vendors, who also want to see
M$ go away. But if M$ is removed from the picture, suddenly it's a
free(-speech) *ix vs. closed, proprietary Unix and our UDI "allies" become
enemies. In fact, the article about UDI says as much: the proprietary
folks want us to do the legwork for them in creating drivers, then they will
add their own closed-source changes. (Read it.)

If we do become involved with UDI, we must do so in a way that doesn't leave
us defenseless. That doesn't mean we must stay away from UDI, but it does
mean that going all-out for it without some thought for our own goals *will*
cause problems for us later.

-- 
brandon s. allbery	[os/2][linux][solaris][japh]	 allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator	     [WAY too many hats]	   allbery@ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering					 KF8NH
carnegie mellon university

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/