Re: STREAMS: interface versus implementation

Matthew G. Marsh (mgm@paktronix.com)
Thu, 17 Sep 1998 06:45:14 -0500 (CDT)


On Wed, 16 Sep 1998, Larry McVoy wrote:

> : Theodore Y. Ts'o writes:
> : > Does anyone know of any significant base of application code that
> : > really does use Streams instead of a BSD Sockets-type interface?
> :
>
> "Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu>
> : AFAIK it is used by boring business software. It's the stuff people
> : might need, not the stuff people have fun with. Software that runs
> : on gross systems like SCO OpenServer could be ported to Linux.
>
> This doesn't answer the question. Please list by name the software
> applications (not counting drivers) which use STREAMS. Thanks.

OK. I have been following this wondering if anyone remembers the thread
earlier in the spring/summer about the port of Novell Netware to Linux by
Caldera. Netware uses streams and unfortunately one of the engineers from
Caldera snitted about streams support in the kernel. Twas a bad spree.

A user/module based STREAMS would be just the ticket for supporting
Netware under Linux. Much better than the current patch the kernel for
streams method. As I end up doing much work integrating Netware and Linux
(Netware 5.0 is awesome in combination with Linux management!!) it would
be nice to be able to use Caldera's Netware for Linux on the new kernels.

Anyway - 1. Novell Portable Netware 4.10b uses STREAMS.

--------------------------------------------------
Matthew G. Marsh, President
Paktronix Systems, LLC
1506 North 59th Street
Omaha NE 68104
Phone: (402) 932-7250
Email: mgm@paktronix.com
WWW: http://www.paktronix.com
--------------------------------------------------

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/