Re: 2.1.118 Tons of oopes

David S. Miller (davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com)
Thu, 27 Aug 1998 07:19:51 -0700


Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 07:25:34 +1000
From: Richard Gooch <rgooch@atnf.csiro.au>

Definately not! But if flush() was appended to the structure, then
people had only to recompile their drivers and all would be fine. So
there would be no silent failures in that scheme.

...

So please explain where the benefit of placing flush() in the middle
is?

So that people don't "only recompile their drivers" and the driver
code actually get updated and fixes done by or sent to the maintainer!

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html