> People seem to think that I don't care. They are wrong. I _do_ care.
> But I just don't think it's a showstopper if 2.0.x is faster on a
> low-end machine than 2.2.x will be. I won't even worry about it, in
> fact. I will just make sure that 2.2 is "reasonable" on 8MB, but
> "reasonable" has nothing to do with comparing to 2.0.x.
That of course, is your right. However it's not unreasonable to squeeze as
much as performance out of a 386/486 machine, is it not? OK, this is my
last posting on this subject unless someone gets an inspiration and speeds
up Linux to the extent that a 1MB 386 outperforms a 1GB 686 with NT :o)
Cheers,
Alex.
--- /\_/\ Legalise cannabis now! ( o.o ) Smoke some cannabis today! > ^ < Peace, Love, Unity and Respect to all.Check out http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html