On Fri, 10 Jul 1998, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
> I'm not sure why RH went with egcs in 5.1 when Linus has stated publically
> that there are problems with egcs. If gcc-2.8.1 was stable, why not stick
> with it? Oh well...
Uh, Red Hat 5.1 does not default to egcs. The default compiler is gcc
2.7.2.3. Slackware 3.5 made the mistake of using egcs by default.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: PGP Signed with PineSign 2.0
iQCVAwUBNaZZQvAH0eZN+dr9AQEKlQQAxoZwRgIlGZGBIlURq8kwrbpOmExDF0rS
lx60yjvkxaFno8YgvJQNWgbm9iu+bNVz8MJ2gqoLlauvU47tR8s5BiRc6HY8rFZx
Z7b4SXRJbDny3BdZjuqG/+hwpJManu9n+573vqY9qCcqMLnJ1TXe0dFVkFuHsBSn
n080cgoZ4UU=
=9epJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
================================================================
| Greg Patterson | EMAIL: gomer@gomer.mlink.net |
| | gomer@mlink.net |
| Move over Microsoft, | IRC: Wizird (EFNET) |
| Linux is here to stay. | WWW: http://gomer.mlink.net/~root |
================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html