Re: SACK in 2.0.x
James Michael Mastros (root@jennifer-unix.dyn.ml.org)
Sun, 28 Jun 1998 18:21:10 -0400
On Sun, Jun 28, 1998 at 02:49:39 PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> no
That probably deserves a bit more explanation: 2.0.x is a stable tree,
meaning that new things aren't going to be added that aren't:
a) _Absolutly_ neccessary
b) _Certian_ not to break anything.
Whether there is an "and" there or an "or" depends on who you ask.
2.2.0 should be hitting the wire before too long, so [insert your favorite
2.1.x feature here] will be in a stable kernel then.
-=- James Mastros
--
True mastery is knowing enough to bullshit the rest.
-=- Me
This e-mail is licensed under the OP/L. See www.opencontent.org.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu