Re: Thread implementations...

Ulrich Drepper (drepper@cygnus.com)
25 Jun 1998 20:56:34 -0700


"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@dcs.ed.ac.uk> writes:

> posix.1b signals are standard; SIGIO is standard; combining the two
> is an obvious way to implement completion queues with a minimum of
> non-standardness. It's not _completely_ standard, but I don't see
> any fully standard and scalable interface alternatives right now.

It's not a non-standard solution. POSIX.1b explicitly leaves it
undefined whether the "normal" signals can be used with the RT signal
functions or not. So a solution based on SIGIO+RT sigs is allowed by
the standard, it might just be not portable.

-- 
---------------.      drepper at gnu.org  ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Cygnus Solutions `--' drepper at cygnus.com   `------------------------

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu