Re: [EXAMPLE-PATCH] /proc/config

Stephen Williams (steve@icarus.icarus.com)
Sat, 30 May 1998 10:39:59 -0700


mj@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz said:
> I don't expect /proc/config to give _gzipped_ answer, so you either
> have to include ungzip code in the kernel or you cannot have the data
> compressed in memory. _Runtime_ size of the kernel is more important
> than the on-disk size.

Why not? So call it /proc/config.gz. And I imagine something like
this is rc.boot:

cat /proc/config.gz | gzip -d > /boot/config
rm /proc/config.gz

I agree that it is slightly silly kernel bloat, but give the guy a break.
At least he's not filling the list with I-hate-linux-because-it-doesn't-
have-silly-feature-X-and-I'm-too-lazy-to-do-it-myself messages. I agree
that it shouldn't go in the kernel mainstream, but there are places for
bolt-on patches, and there is clearly an audience for this.

(P.S. I remember being beaten up pretty soundly when I offered my
/proc/pcibus patch for 2.1.55. Such a response can be demotivating.)

--
Steve Williams                "The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
steve@icarus.com              But I have promises to keep,
steve@picturel.com            and lines to code before I sleep,
http://www.picturel.com       And lines to code before I sleep."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu