> Hi Scott,
> I have a Laptop with APM. I removed the other #ifndef CONFIG_APM's and
> the #endif's to get 2.1.102 to compile.
> I then suspended and let it sit awhile, then did:
> date ; hwclock
> The two matched. (using apm-1.4)
No, the relevant issue is whether you will get sporadic divide-by-zero
oopsen in your logs after long periods of idle time with APM enabled.
I don't think that 'date; hwclock' is a valid check.
The correct solution is to replace the removed #ifdefs, not remove the
others protecting you.
--Scott
@ @
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-oOO-(_)-OOo-=-=-=-=-=
C. Scott Ananian: cananian@lcs.mit.edu / Declare the Truth boldly and
Laboratory for Computer Science/Crypto / without hindrance.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology /META-PARRESIAS AKOLUTOS:Acts 28:31
-.-. .-.. .. ..-. ..-. --- .-. -.. ... -.-. --- - - .- -. .- -. .. .- -.
PGP key available via finger and from http://www.pdos.lcs.mit.edu/~cananian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu