Re: Problem with kernel-pll in 2.0.3x (at least)

J.S.Peatfield@damtp.cam.ac.uk
Fri, 1 May 1998 01:25:53 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Phil's Kernel Account: "Re: CDROM jukebox filesystem using autofs"
Previous message: Ulrich Windl: "Re: Problem with kernel-pll in 2.0.3x (at least)"
Maybe in reply to: Jon Peatfield: "Problem with kernel-pll in 2.0.3x (at least)"
Next in thread: Ulrich Windl: "Re: Problem with kernel-pll in 2.0.3x (at least)"

No, I'm saying allow the clock the be altered by this distance.
If there is no way to reach a speed between two values of tick
then there is no way the clock can be guarenteed to run at the right
speed, or am I missing some other adustment?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Phil's Kernel Account: "Re: CDROM jukebox filesystem using autofs"
Previous message: Ulrich Windl: "Re: Problem with kernel-pll in 2.0.3x (at least)"
Maybe in reply to: Jon Peatfield: "Problem with kernel-pll in 2.0.3x (at least)"
Next in thread: Ulrich Windl: "Re: Problem with kernel-pll in 2.0.3x (at least)"