Re: Problem with kernel-pll in 2.0.3x (at least)

Ulrich Windl (ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de)
Fri, 1 May 1998 02:29:30 +0200


On 1 May 98 at 1:25, J.S.Peatfield@damtp.cam.ac.uk wrote:

> No, I'm saying allow the clock the be altered by this distance.
> If there is no way to reach a speed between two values of tick
> then there is no way the clock can be guarenteed to run at the right
> speed, or am I missing some other adustment?

I read the second, incomplete message first. You are right, but your
solution isn't very beautiful.

Ulrich

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu