Re: Sporadious hang on 2.0.3[0,1,2,3,4pre2]
Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Wed, 4 Mar 1998 11:59:48 +0000 (GMT)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Daniel Ryde: "Re: Sporadious hang on 2.0.3[0,1,2,3,4pre2]"
- Previous message: Guest section DW: "Re: Sporadious hang on 2.0.3[0,1,2,3,4pre2]"
- In reply to: Guest section DW: "Re: Sporadious hang on 2.0.3[0,1,2,3,4pre2]"
- Next in thread: Keith Rowland: "Re: Sporadious hang on 2.0.3[0,1,2,3,4pre2]"
> > 2.0.29 + teardrop + inode fix is still the most solid Linux kernel under
> > all heavy use testing. Nobody requires you run 2.0.33 8)
> >
> > Alan
>
> Nobody wants `Linux x.y.z patched with patch foo found at url-1 and patch
> bar found at url-2'. Such a description in itself is too unstable.
This is a good point in some ways.
> If you claim that a certain version of 2.0.* is the most stable Linux
> kernel around, package it up as linux-2.0.29A.tar.gz and advertize it
> as the most stable kernel around. Hundreds of people will use it and
> be happy (hopefully).
Well there is certainly a good project for someone in that.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
- Next message: Daniel Ryde: "Re: Sporadious hang on 2.0.3[0,1,2,3,4pre2]"
- Previous message: Guest section DW: "Re: Sporadious hang on 2.0.3[0,1,2,3,4pre2]"
- In reply to: Guest section DW: "Re: Sporadious hang on 2.0.3[0,1,2,3,4pre2]"
- Next in thread: Keith Rowland: "Re: Sporadious hang on 2.0.3[0,1,2,3,4pre2]"