2.1.65 seems to work fine...

Edward Welbon (welbon@bga.com)
Mon, 17 Nov 1997 23:49:52 -0600 (CST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Chris Wedgwood: "Select 2.1.65"
Previous message: Mitch Davis: "Re: Ideas for memory management hackers (2)"
Next in thread: Denis Karpov: "Re: 2.1.65 seems to work fine..."
Maybe reply: Denis Karpov: "Re: 2.1.65 seems to work fine..."
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: Ideas for memory management hackers (2)"

2.1.65 seems to work fine. I could not get 2.1.64 to boot. It seemed
that I could not mount my raid0 as root.

Ed Welbon - welbon@bga.com

Next message: Chris Wedgwood: "Select 2.1.65"
Previous message: Mitch Davis: "Re: Ideas for memory management hackers (2)"
Next in thread: Denis Karpov: "Re: 2.1.65 seems to work fine..."
Maybe reply: Denis Karpov: "Re: 2.1.65 seems to work fine..."
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: Ideas for memory management hackers (2)"