Re: useful LKM?

Raul Miller (rdm@test.legislate.com)
Wed, 1 Oct 1997 21:22:37 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Aaron Tiensivu: "Network benchmark closely tied to kernel.."
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: Linux (free s/w) support"
In reply to: Martin von Loewis: "Re: useful LKM?"

> > For linux kernel modules to be useful, you'd have to be able to build
> > modules in a fashion which is independent of the current kernel
> > configuration. Is anyone working on this?

Martin von Loewis <martin@mira.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Module versioning is supposed to do exactly that. Why don't you use it?

Because it doesn't work well enough. As I stated in my original
configuration, with major changes in the kernel configuration what
happens is that the modules won't load.

-- 
Raul

Next message: Aaron Tiensivu: "Network benchmark closely tied to kernel.."
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: Linux (free s/w) support"
In reply to: Martin von Loewis: "Re: useful LKM?"