Re: useful LKM?

Martin von Loewis (martin@mira.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de)
Wed, 1 Oct 1997 23:39:29 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: Linux (free s/w) support"
Previous message: Richard A. Soderberg: "Re: wierd problem with 'make dep'"
Maybe in reply to: Raul Miller: "useful LKM?"
Next in thread: Raul Miller: "Re: useful LKM?"
Reply: Raul Miller: "Re: useful LKM?"

> For linux kernel modules to be useful, you'd have to be able to build
> modules in a fashion which is independent of the current kernel
> configuration. Is anyone working on this?

Module versioning is supposed to do exactly that. Why don't you use it?

Regards,
Martin

Next message: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: Linux (free s/w) support"
Previous message: Richard A. Soderberg: "Re: wierd problem with 'make dep'"
Maybe in reply to: Raul Miller: "useful LKM?"
Next in thread: Raul Miller: "Re: useful LKM?"
Reply: Raul Miller: "Re: useful LKM?"