Re: UDP network problem

Philip Blundell (Philip.Blundell@pobox.com)
Mon, 18 Aug 1997 19:26:25 -0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Doug Ledford: "Re: pre-31-7 does badblocks better than -6"
Previous message: Teunis Peters: "versioning filesystems and linux"
Maybe in reply to: mshar@vax.ipm.ac.ir: "UDP network problem"
Next in thread: Chang-hao Tsai: "Re: UDP network problem"

>Isn't there a maximum allowed packet length of 1500 bytes on Ethenet??

Yes

>Doesn't this confine the maximum data area to about 1480 bytes to leave
>room or the header??

Yes

>You can't fragment UDP

Yes you can.

p.

Next message: Doug Ledford: "Re: pre-31-7 does badblocks better than -6"
Previous message: Teunis Peters: "versioning filesystems and linux"
Maybe in reply to: mshar@vax.ipm.ac.ir: "UDP network problem"
Next in thread: Chang-hao Tsai: "Re: UDP network problem"