Re: Killing clones

H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
15 Aug 1997 05:53:08 GMT


Followup to: <199708150445.AAA05262@mercury.cs.uml.edu>
By author: "Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> That solves a concern I had: /proc could run out of inode numbers.
> It also avoids dealing with signed/unsigned 16/32 bit troubles.
> How well would the thread APIs tolerate this?
>

/proc wouldn't run out of inode numbers, but allocation would be more
painful (the limiting factor is the size of the process table anyway.)

As far as the APIs go this should be no different than the "high bits"
solution that was suggested -- the "high bits" stuff really just
amounts to a different policy of allocating tid's.

-hpa

-- 
    PGP: 2047/2A960705 BA 03 D3 2C 14 A8 A8 BD  1E DF FE 69 EE 35 BD 74
    See http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/ for web page and full PGP public key
Always looking for a few good BOsFH.  **  Linux - the OS of global cooperation
        I am Baha'i -- ask me about it or see http://www.bahai.org/