Now, why didn't we think of this before?
Miguel de Icaza (miguel@nuclecu.unam.mx)
Mon, 24 Mar 1997 14:05:50 -0600
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: James L. McGill: "Re: >256 fd patch..."
- Previous message: Theodore Y. Ts'o: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Next in thread: Andrew Vanderstock: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Andrew Vanderstock: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Andrew Vanderstock: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: david parsons: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: david parsons: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: thoth@purplefrog.com: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Cameron MacKinnon: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Shawn Rutledge: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Andrew Vanderstock: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Eric Youngdale: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Raul Miller: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Raul Miller: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: david parsons: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Eric Youngdale: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Lauri Tischler: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
And I wonder, why were we ever concerned about speed issues?
Miguel.
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 10:16:50 -0800 (PST)
From: "W. Reilly Cooley" <wcooley@navi.net>
To: mach4-users@cs.utah.edu
Subject: Re: Portability
In-Reply-To: <199703241352.NAA06096@odie.barnet.ac.uk>
X-X-Sender: wcooley@navi.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
I had an idea for an interesting project, which would provide
remarkable portability: A Java VM server for a Mach4 MK, which could then
run Sun's JavaOS, or any other OS written in Java. Considering that
JavaOS is not free, it would perhaps be a good excuse to implement the
Linux kernel in Java, as had been thrown around a bit. This second
project could draw also from the work done on MkLinux.
Maybe when I return to school and have more time...
What do you think?
Wil
- -------------------------------------------------------------
W. Reilly Cooley
NakedApe Consulting & Navi.Net representative
1509 NE 10th Ave., #104 Portland, OR 97232
503 287-2165 wcooley@navi.net
www.navi.net/~wcooley www.navi.net/~nakedape
As a service, I provide analysis for viruses and poor grammar to senders
of unsolicited commercial e-mail at a rate of US$250 per hour. Delivery of
said correspondence constitutes a request for the aforementioned services
at said price.
------- End of forwarded message -------
- Next message: James L. McGill: "Re: >256 fd patch..."
- Previous message: Theodore Y. Ts'o: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Next in thread: Andrew Vanderstock: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Andrew Vanderstock: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Andrew Vanderstock: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: david parsons: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: david parsons: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: thoth@purplefrog.com: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Cameron MacKinnon: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Shawn Rutledge: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Andrew Vanderstock: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Eric Youngdale: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Raul Miller: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Raul Miller: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: david parsons: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Eric Youngdale: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: Lauri Tischler: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
- Maybe reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"