Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Miguel de Icaza: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
• Previous message: William Burrow: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
• Maybe in reply to: Miguel de Icaza: "Now, why didn't we think of this before?"

JavaOS should be ported natively to whatever processor is of interest; you
shouldn't have an OS on top of a VM on top of a VM. Besides, for the client-
side applications that Java was intended for, it can stand alone; Linux is
not an end in itself, especially for those apps, and having a shell on top
of Java is not that useful. Linux's strength is being on the server side
of the network of Java clients, or running a combination of fast native code
and slow Java clients.

-- 
  _______                      KB7PWD @ KC7Y.AZ.US.NOAM   ecloud@goodnet.com
 (_  | |_)   Shawn T. Rutledge    on the web: http://www.goodnet.com/~ecloud
 __) | | \__________________________________________________________________
* 808 State * TCP/IP packet * freedom of information * VRML * Java * 

• Next message: Miguel de Icaza: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
• Previous message: William Burrow: "Re: Now, why didn't we think of this before?"
• Maybe in reply to: Miguel de Icaza: "Now, why didn't we think of this before?"