Re: 2.1.22 name space analysis

Keith Owens (kaos@ocs.com.au)
Tue, 28 Jan 1997 09:24:53 +1100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Controller trashes FS (what's new)"
Previous message: Jacques Gelinas: "Re: 2.0.28 problems....."
Maybe in reply to: Keith Owens: "2.1.22 name space analysis"

On Mon, 27 Jan 1997 13:13:48 -0500,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU> wrote:
>Grumble.... *when* will where be a stable kernel/modutils combination
>that doesn't require 200+ kilbytes to the kernel before you have
>something which might (or might not) work? I understand that things
>might be unstable for a little while during the 2.1 development series,
>but if things remain too broken for too long, developers won't be able
>to work against the latest versions, either. This is Bad (tm).

Perhaps it's time for a bug fix freeze. Get the existing code to
compile clean and run, together with clean modutils and pcmcia before
rewriting more sections of the kernel.

Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Controller trashes FS (what's new)"
Previous message: Jacques Gelinas: "Re: 2.0.28 problems....."
Maybe in reply to: Keith Owens: "2.1.22 name space analysis"