Re: Linux Kernel / C++

John Henders (msmith@quix.robins.af.mil)
Fri, 2 Aug 1996 13:42:48 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jim Nance: "More kernel profiling"
Previous message: John Henders: "Re: netscape + SIGUNUSED -> 96% CPU"
In reply to: Drew Eckhardt: "Re: Linux Kernel / C++"
Next in thread: Chris Griffin: "> 64mb with 2.0.10"

> We did it, but stopped using the C++ front end when it became apparant
> that it lagged far behind the gcc C front end in terms of generating
> correct code; especially with volatiles.

Yes and hopefully 2.8.0 will make up some of that distance between
the two.

Melvin

Next message: Jim Nance: "More kernel profiling"
Previous message: John Henders: "Re: netscape + SIGUNUSED -> 96% CPU"
In reply to: Drew Eckhardt: "Re: Linux Kernel / C++"
Next in thread: Chris Griffin: "> 64mb with 2.0.10"