Re: Distributions with 2.0 yet?

J.H.M.Dassen (jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl)
Fri, 21 Jun 1996 16:49:33 +0200 (MDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Tyson D Sawyer: "Re: Why RedHat distribution."
Previous message: Andrew C. Esh: "Re: Simple, effective boot graphic"
In reply to: Jared Mauch: "Distributions with 2.0 yet?"
Next in thread: Theodore Y. Ts'o: "Re: Distributions with 2.0 yet?"

> Does anyone know of distributions (slackware, redhat, caldera)
> that have a 2.0 kernel standard, w/ all the utilities that go
> with it yet?

Debian Linux 1.1 (see http://www.debian.org/) has a 2.0 kernel
with matching utilities (see http://www.debian.org/FTP ; this index may
be a couple of days behind (it is generated on a mirror)).

Ray

-- 
POPULATION EXPLOSION  Unique in human experience, an event which happened 
yesterday but which everyone swears won't happen until tomorrow.  
- The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan

Next message: Tyson D Sawyer: "Re: Why RedHat distribution."
Previous message: Andrew C. Esh: "Re: Simple, effective boot graphic"
In reply to: Jared Mauch: "Distributions with 2.0 yet?"
Next in thread: Theodore Y. Ts'o: "Re: Distributions with 2.0 yet?"