[PATCH v3 1/2] x86/math64: handle #DE in mul_u64_u64_div_u64()
From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Fri Aug 15 2025 - 12:47:48 EST
Change mul_u64_u64_div_u64() to return ULONG_MAX if the result doesn't
fit into u64 or div == 0. The former matches the generic implementation
in lib/math/div64.c, the latter doesn't. Perhaps we will add a WARN()
into the fixup_exception() paths later.
No need to use _ASM_EXTABLE_TYPE_REG(), we know that the target register
is pt_regs->ax with offset == 0, so a simple EX_DATA_REG(0) should work
just fine.
Reported-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/78a0d7bb20504c0884d474868eccd858@xxxxxxxxx/
Reviewed-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h
index 9931e4c7d73f..c2532d38ed0a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h
@@ -79,18 +79,21 @@ static inline u64 mul_u32_u32(u32 a, u32 b)
#else
# include <asm-generic/div64.h>
+# include <asm/asm.h>
/*
- * Will generate an #DE when the result doesn't fit u64, could fix with an
- * __ex_table[] entry when it becomes an issue.
+ * Returns U64_MAX if the result doesn't fit u64 or div == 0.
*/
static inline u64 mul_u64_u64_div_u64(u64 a, u64 mul, u64 div)
{
u64 q;
- asm ("mulq %2; divq %3" : "=a" (q)
- : "a" (a), "rm" (mul), "rm" (div)
- : "rdx");
+ asm ("mulq %2; 1: divq %3; 2:\n"
+ _ASM_EXTABLE_TYPE(1b, 2b,
+ EX_TYPE_IMM_REG | EX_DATA_REG(0) | EX_DATA_IMM(-1))
+ : "=a" (q)
+ : "a" (a), "rm" (mul), "rm" (div)
+ : "rdx");
return q;
}
--
2.25.1.362.g51ebf55