Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86/fpu: don't abuse x86_task_fpu(PF_USER_WORKER) in .regset_get() paths

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 08/15, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
> On 8/15/25 08:52, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Dave, Sohil, what do you think?
> >
> > OK, it seems that 5/6 (and thus 6/6) needs more discussion, but what
> > about 1-3 for the start?
> They kinda need fleshed out changelogs first, don't you think?
> Especially 1/6. It also needs an actual cover letter explaining what
> it's trying to do and the larger context. Ideally, it's self-contained
> and as opposed to links to previous discussions.

I agree about the cover letter, but what else do you think the changelog
in 1/6 could say? ;)

OK, I'll try to improve and resend.

Oleg.