Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86/fpu: don't abuse x86_task_fpu(PF_USER_WORKER) in .regset_get() paths

[Dave Hansen]

On 8/15/25 08:52, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Dave, Sohil, what do you think?
> 
> OK, it seems that 5/6 (and thus 6/6) needs more discussion, but what
> about 1-3 for the start?
They kinda need fleshed out changelogs first, don't you think?
Especially 1/6. It also needs an actual cover letter explaining what
it's trying to do and the larger context. Ideally, it's self-contained
and as opposed to links to previous discussions.