Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: arm64: initialise SCTLR2_EL1 at __kvm_host_psci_cpu_entry()
From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Mon Aug 11 2025 - 13:51:45 EST
On Mon, 11 Aug 2025 17:33:40 +0100,
Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> initialise SCTLR2_EL1 at __kvm_host_psci_cpu_entry().
Same comment, I don't think this is an acceptable commit message.
Please ask for help if you don't feel confident writing it (I'm sure
some of your colleagues will be happy to help).
>
> Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/psci-relay.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/psci-relay.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/psci-relay.c
> index c3e196fb8b18..4ed4b7fa57c2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/psci-relay.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/psci-relay.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> * Author: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@xxxxxxxxxx>
> */
>
> +#include <asm/alternative.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
> @@ -219,6 +220,8 @@ asmlinkage void __noreturn __kvm_host_psci_cpu_entry(bool is_cpu_on)
> release_boot_args(boot_args);
>
> write_sysreg_el1(INIT_SCTLR_EL1_MMU_OFF, SYS_SCTLR);
> + if (alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_HAS_SCTLR2))
> + write_sysreg_el1(INIT_SCTLR2_EL1, SYS_SCTLR2);
> write_sysreg(INIT_PSTATE_EL1, SPSR_EL2);
>
> __host_enter(host_ctxt);
This needs to be folded into patch #1.
Otherwise, there is a window of patches where the kernel will not
survive CPU hotplug when booted in protected mode.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.