Re: [PATCH] riscv: Use for_each_online_cpu() instead of for_each_cpu()

[Jesse Taube]

On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 11:34 PM Fushuai Wang <wangfushuai@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Replace the opencoded for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) loop with the
> more readable and equivalent for_each_online_cpu(cpu) macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fushuai Wang <wangfushuai@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
> index ae2068425fbc..5e11b1bd9b2a 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static void __init check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void)
>          * Allocate separate buffers for each CPU so there's no fighting over
>          * cache lines.
>          */
> -       for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) {
> +       for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>                 bufs[cpu] = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER);
>                 if (!bufs[cpu]) {
>                         pr_warn("Allocation failure, not measuring misaligned performance\n");
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static void __init check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void)
>         smp_call_on_cpu(0, check_unaligned_access, bufs[0], true);
>
>  out:
> -       for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) {
> +       for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {

Good find.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Taube <jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

>                 if (bufs[cpu])
>                         __free_pages(bufs[cpu], MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER);
>         }
> --
> 2.36.1
>