[PATCH] riscv: Use for_each_online_cpu() instead of for_each_cpu()

[Fushuai Wang]

Replace the opencoded for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) loop with the
more readable and equivalent for_each_online_cpu(cpu) macro.

Signed-off-by: Fushuai Wang <wangfushuai@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
index ae2068425fbc..5e11b1bd9b2a 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static void __init check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void)
 	 * Allocate separate buffers for each CPU so there's no fighting over
 	 * cache lines.
 	 */
-	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) {
+	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
 		bufs[cpu] = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER);
 		if (!bufs[cpu]) {
 			pr_warn("Allocation failure, not measuring misaligned performance\n");
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static void __init check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void)
 	smp_call_on_cpu(0, check_unaligned_access, bufs[0], true);
 
 out:
-	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) {
+	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
 		if (bufs[cpu])
 			__free_pages(bufs[cpu], MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER);
 	}
-- 
2.36.1