On 29/06/25 18:48, Waiman Long wrote:
On 6/27/25 7:51 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:...
Yeah, looks like it's not required. Will remove. Thanks for spotting it!@@ -1652,6 +1664,8 @@ int dl_server_apply_params(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, u64 runtime, u64 perioYour patch doesn't explain why a RCU guard is needed here?
int retval = 0;
int cpus;
+ guard(rcu)();
+
sched_init_dl_servers() is the changed caller, but it is called with
rq_lock_irq held which should implies a RCU read critical section as IRQ is
disabled.