Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm: Introduce vm_uffd_ops API

[Peter Xu]

On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 07:25:11PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Oh, yes, agreed on WP_ASYNC. But they would not be using the vma_ops thingy,
> right?

Yes, currently WP_ASYNC bypassed that. So if something declares WP in the
uffd_features in the new API it'll be only for sync (and it really should
almost start working for most files too like what async did..).

-- 
Peter Xu