Re: [PATCH 2/4] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Use non-coherent memory for DMA

[Vladimir Oltean]

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 03:14:32PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> > FWIW, the XSPI FIFO performance should be higher.
> 
> This leads me to realise a mistake in my original figures. My head was stuck
> in target mode where we use DMA so I forgot to force DMA in host mode to run
> the performance tests. The previous figures were all XSPI mode and the small
> difference in performance could have been just down to the layout of the
> code changing?
> 
> Changing it to DMA mode gives figures that make much more sense:
> 
> Coherent (4096 byte transfers): 6534 kbps
> Non-coherent:                   7347 kbps
> 
> Coherent (16 byte transfers):    447 kbps
> Non-coherent:                    448 kbps
> 
> 
> Just for comparison running the same test in XSPI mode:
> 
> 4096 byte transfers:            2143 kbps
> 16 byte transfers:               637 kbps

So to be clear, the 'non-coherent' test was done just with patch 2
applied, or also with 3?