Re: [PATCH RESEND] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add support for camss

[Vladimir Zapolskiy]

Hi Konrad.

On 6/11/25 00:04, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 6/10/25 11:02 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> > On 6/10/25 22:02, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> > > On 10/06/2025 13:49, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> > > > > List feedback from DT people is isp@ is the correct prefix.
> > > >
> > > > My bad, but I don't understand this comment, it seems irrelevant...
> > > >
> > > > The expressed concern is about the novel label name.
> > >
> > > I mean to say the feedback from Krzysztof was that we should use isp@
> > > not camss@ and I agree.
> >
> > Let me repeat it thrice, it's okay...
> >
> > I don't object against the properly selected device tree node name "isp",
> > here I object against a never used and very questionable label name "isp".
> >
> > Please feel free to ask more questions, if you still find it confusing.
> >
> > Again, I may missed a discussion about the need to get and use a novel
> > label name, then please share a link to it, it'll be very much appreciated.
>
> To hopefully help out:
>
> label: node-name@unit-address {
> 	property = value;
> };

Thank you, here is a link to the wanted section of the dt specification
for Bryan's comprehension:

* https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter6-source-language.rst.

If for whatever reason a proposed "isp" label is preferred, then
since a label rename is not an ABI change, it would make sense to
do a massive change of renaming all camss labels. Otherwise there will
be an outstanding incorrespondence/confusion of the label names in
board .dts files, and that's bad.

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir