Re: [PATCH RESEND] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add support for camss

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 6/10/25 11:02 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 6/10/25 22:02, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 10/06/2025 13:49, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> List feedback from DT people is isp@ is the correct prefix.
>>>>
>>>
>>> My bad, but I don't understand this comment, it seems irrelevant...
>>>
>>> The expressed concern is about the novel label name.
>>
>> I mean to say the feedback from Krzysztof was that we should use isp@
>> not camss@ and I agree.
>>
> 
> Let me repeat it thrice, it's okay...
> 
> I don't object against the properly selected device tree node name "isp",
> here I object against a never used and very questionable label name "isp".
> 
> Please feel free to ask more questions, if you still find it confusing.
> 
> Again, I may missed a discussion about the need to get and use a novel
> label name, then please share a link to it, it'll be very much appreciated.

To hopefully help out:

label: node-name@unit-address {
	property = value;
};

Konrad