Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: arm: lpc: add missed lpc43xx board

[Frank Li]

On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 08:17:06PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 6/2/25 19:04, Frank Li wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 06:34:14PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> > > On 6/2/25 17:06, Frank Li wrote:
> > > > Add missed legancy lpc43xx board compatible string to fix below CHECK_DTB
> > > > warnings:
> > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/lpc/lpc4337-ciaa.dtb: /: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['ciaa,lpc4337', 'nxp,lpc4337', 'nxp,lpc4350']
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >    .../devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml          | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > >    1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > I prefer to see NXP SoC powered boards under Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/nxp/
> > >
> > > LPC18XX/LPC43XX SoCs are not Freescale.
> >
> > Generally, we don't distingiush that, new s32g chip also in this files.
> > All nxp/fsl was maintained by one person and everyone know these are one
> > company now.
>
> Well, my concern is actually not about the companies, but these two SoC
> families are totally different, the peripherals or core controllers are
> all different, it makes little sense to mix them up.

This just collect board level compatible string, like trivial-devices.yaml,
which collect variance devices.

Shawn:
	Do you like create a nxp.yaml for LPC18xx/LPC43xx boards?

Frank

>
> I won't raise any questions or insist on the correctness of i.MX placement
> under arm/nxp or arm/freescale, but NXP LPC32xx and NXP LPC18xx/LPC43xx dt
> bindings shall be put under arm/nxp for certain.
>
> --
> Best wishes,
> Vladimir