Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] mm/page_isolation: remove migratetype parameter from more functions.

[Zi Yan]

On 7 May 2025, at 17:10, Zi Yan wrote:

> migratetype is no longer overwritten during pageblock isolation,
> start_isolate_page_range(), has_unmovable_pages(), and
> set_migratetype_isolate() no longer need which migratetype to restore
> during isolation failure.
>
> For has_unmoable_pages(), it needs to know if the isolation is for CMA
> allocation, so adding CMA_ALLOCATION to isolation flags to provide the
> information.
>
> alloc_contig_range() no longer needs migratetype. Replace it with
> a newly defined acr_flags_t to tell if an allocation is for CMA. So does
> __alloc_contig_migrate_range().
>
> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c    |  3 +--
>  include/linux/gfp.h            |  6 +++++-
>  include/linux/page-isolation.h | 15 +++++++++++---
>  include/trace/events/kmem.h    | 14 +++++++------
>  mm/cma.c                       |  2 +-
>  mm/memory_hotplug.c            |  1 -
>  mm/page_alloc.c                | 22 ++++++++++-----------
>  mm/page_isolation.c            | 36 ++++++++++++----------------------
>  8 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

Here is the fixup 3/3 to address the type issue reported by kernel test robot.

From 3c439f1f09b03c8362b43c0ac05e5f174f1a6655 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 15:42:18 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] fixup for mm/page_isolation: remove migratetype parameter
 from more functions.

1. fixed test_pages_isolated() and __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock()
   signature by using the new isol_flags_t type.
2. fixed test_pages_isolated() doc: flags -> isol_flags

Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/page-isolation.h | 2 +-
 mm/page_isolation.c            | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/page-isolation.h b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
index c176c938da87..20c3f98b5afb 100644
--- a/include/linux/page-isolation.h
+++ b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
@@ -45,5 +45,5 @@ int start_isolate_page_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
 void undo_isolate_page_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn);

 int test_pages_isolated(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
-			int isol_flags);
+			isol_flags_t isol_flags);
 #endif
diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c
index a9d0e75db95d..5f00d7113766 100644
--- a/mm/page_isolation.c
+++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ void undo_isolate_page_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
  */
 static unsigned long
 __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
-				  int flags)
+				  isol_flags_t flags)
 {
 	struct page *page;

@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
  *
  * This tests if all in the specified range are free.
  *
- * If %MEMORY_OFFLINE is specified in @flags, it will consider
+ * If %MEMORY_OFFLINE is specified in @isol_flags, it will consider
  * poisoned and offlined pages free as well.
  *
  * Caller must ensure the requested range doesn't span zones.
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
  * Returns 0 if true, -EBUSY if one or more pages are in use.
  */
 int test_pages_isolated(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
-			int isol_flags)
+			isol_flags_t isol_flags)
 {
 	unsigned long pfn, flags;
 	struct page *page;
-- 
2.47.2




Best Regards,
Yan, Zi