Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] mm: remove swap_free() and always use swap_free_nr()

[Barry Song]

On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 12:03 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 01:37:06PM -0700, Chris Li wrote:
> > Either way works. It will produce the same machine code. I have a
> > slight inclination to just drop swap_free(entry) API so that it
> > discourages the caller to do a for loop over swap_free().
>
> Then just ad the number of entries parameter to swap_free and do away
> with the separate swap_free_nr.

swap_free_nr() isn't separate, after this patch, it is the only one left.
there won't be swap_free() any more. it seems you want to directly
"rename" it to swap_free()?