Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] mm: remove swap_free() and always use swap_free_nr()

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 01:37:06PM -0700, Chris Li wrote:
> Either way works. It will produce the same machine code. I have a
> slight inclination to just drop swap_free(entry) API so that it
> discourages the caller to do a for loop over swap_free().

Then just ad the number of entries parameter to swap_free and do away
with the separate swap_free_nr.