RE: [PATCH v2] gpio: mmio: handle "ngpios" properly in bgpio_init()

From: Asmaa Mnebhi
Date: Fri Feb 24 2023 - 16:31:31 EST


> > bgpio_init() uses "sz" argument to populate ngpio, which is not
> > accurate. Instead, read the "ngpios" property from the DT and if it
> > doesn't exist, use the "sz" argument. With this change, drivers no
> > longer need to overwrite the ngpio variable after calling bgpio_init.
>
> ...
>
> > + ret = device_property_present(dev, "ngpios");
> > + if (!ret)
>
> ret is not of the correct type for this call.
>
> Why not simply
>
> if (!device_property_present(dev, "ngpios"))
>
> > + gc->ngpio = gc->bgpio_bits;
>
> ...
>
> The problem with this change is that you need to provide bgpio_bits.
>
> So, if there is a property when bgpio_bits will be updated?
>
> That's said what you need is something like this:
> 1) split "ngpios" handling code (lines ~718-744 in gpiolib.c) into a helper
> function that is available inside drivers/gpio;
> 2) use it in bgpio_init() by overriding bgpio_bits.
>
> ret = new_helper();
> if (ret)
> gc->bgpio_bits = sz * 8;
> else
> ... = gc->ngpio;

So this new_helper() which reads the ngpios property, would be called from bgpio_init() and
From gpiochip_add_data_with_key() correct? Since there are some drivers that don’t use
bgpio_init().
Also, shouldn't "gc->bgpio_bits = = sz * 8;" be independent of new_helper() function?
"bgpio_bits" is described as "number of register bits used for a generic GPIO i.e. <register width> * 8"
which seems different from "ngpio" described as "the number of GPIOs handled by this controller"