Re: [PATCH net-next v3 01/10] net: wwan: tmi: Add PCIe core

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 07:39:33 +0000 Yanchao Yang (杨彦超) wrote:
> > > Do you really need these flags?  
> > 
> > We will check and update if it's really redundant soon.  
> Update test result.
> Both flags are deleted, then run the make command with 
> "build in" and "build module" on a separate kernel tree. Both suffer
> the same build error.
> “drivers/net/wan/mediatek/pcie/mtk_pci.c:16:10: fatal error: mtk_fsm.h:
> No such file or directory
>  #include "mtk_fsm.h""
> The reason is that all files are not placed in the same folder. The
> driver named TMI needs a child folder, then needs these flags.
> 
> Any ideas or comments for this? Please help share it at your
> convenience.

Relative paths work, right?

> > > Labels should be named after action they perform, not where they
> > > jump
> > > from. Please fix this everywhere.  
> > 
> > We can found similar samples in kernel codes, naming the label per
> > where jump from…
> > ex. pci-sysfs.c
> > shall we apply this rule to our driver?
> > I
> > t's mandatory or nice to have.  
> 
> Any ideas or comments for this? Please help share it at your
> convenience.

It's mandatory for new code.