Re: [PATCH INTERNAL v1 3/3] regulator: tps6594-regulator: Add driver for TI TPS6594 regulators

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 02:31:29PM +0100, Esteban Blanc wrote:
> From: Jerome Neanne <jneanne@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This patch adds support for TPS6594 regulators (bucks and LDOs).
> The output voltages are configurable and are meant to supply power
> to the main processor and other components.
> Bucks can be used in single or multiphase mode, depending on PMIC
> part number.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Neanne <jneanne@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

You've not provided a Signed-off-by for this so I can't do anything with
it, please see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for details
on what this is and why it's important.

> @@ -0,0 +1,559 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Regulator driver for tps6594 PMIC
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2022 BayLibre Incorporated - https://www.baylibre.com/

Please make the entire comment block a C++ one so things look more
intentional.

> +static unsigned int tps6594_get_mode(struct regulator_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	return REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL;
> +}

If configuring modes isn't supported just omit all mode operations.

> +	}
> +
> +	regulator_notifier_call_chain(irq_data->rdev,
> +				      irq_data->type->event, NULL);
> +
> +	dev_err(irq_data->dev, "Error IRQ trap %s for %s\n",
> +		irq_data->type->event_name, irq_data->type->regulator_name);

I suspect it might avoid future confusion to log the error before
notifying so that any consequences of the error more clearly happen in
response to the error.

> +static int tps6594_get_rdev_by_name(const char *regulator_name,
> +				    struct regulator_dev *rdevbucktbl[BUCK_NB],
> +				    struct regulator_dev *rdevldotbl[LDO_NB],
> +				    struct regulator_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i <= BUCK_NB; i++) {
> +		if (strcmp(regulator_name, buck_regs[i].name) == 0) {
> +			dev = rdevbucktbl[i];
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ldo_regs); i++) {
> +		if (strcmp(regulator_name, ldo_regs[i].name) == 0) {
> +			dev = rdevldotbl[i];
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}

> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tps6594_regulator_irq_types); ++i) {
> +		irq_type = &tps6594_regulator_irq_types[i];
> +
> +		irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, irq_type->irq_name);
> +		if (irq < 0)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		irq_data[i].dev = tps->dev;
> +		irq_data[i].type = irq_type;
> +
> +		tps6594_get_rdev_by_name(irq_type->regulator_name, rdevbucktbl,
> +					 rdevldotbl, rdev);

This would be simpler and you wouldn't need this lookup function if the
regulator descriptions included their IRQ names, then you could just
request the interrupts while registering the regulators.

> +		error = devm_request_threaded_irq(tps->dev, irq, NULL,
> +						  tps6594_regulator_irq_handler,
> +						  IRQF_ONESHOT,
> +						  irq_type->irq_name,
> +						  &irq_data[i]);
> +		if (error) {
> +			dev_err(tps->dev, "failed to request %s IRQ %d: %d\n",
> +				irq_type->irq_name, irq, error);
> +			return error;
> +		}

This leaks all previously requested interrupts.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature