Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: optee: add interrupt controller properties

From: Etienne Carriere
Date: Wed Jan 25 2023 - 16:00:49 EST


On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 at 21:22, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> +Sudeep
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 11:56:41AM +0100, Etienne Carriere wrote:
> > Adds an optional interrupt controller property to optee firmware node
> > in the DT bindings. Optee driver may embeds an irqchip exposing
> > interrupts notified by the TEE world. Optee registers up to 1 interrupt
> > controller and identifies each line with a line number from 0 to
> > UINT16_MAX.
> >
> > In the example, the platform SCMI device uses optee interrupt irq 5
> > as async signal to trigger processing of an async incoming SCMI message,
> > in the scope of a CPU DVFS control. A platform can have several SCMI
> > channels driven this way. Optee irqs also permits small embedded devices
> > to share e.g. a gpio expander, a group of wakeup sources, etc... between
> > OP-TEE world (for sensitive services) and Linux world (for non-sensitive
> > services). The physical controller is driven from the TEE which exposes
> > some controls to Linux kernel.
> >
> > Cc: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Pascal Paillet <p.paillet@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Pascal Paillet <p.paillet@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Added a description to #interrupt-cells property.
> > - Changed of example. Linux wakeup event was subject to discussion and
> > i don't know much about input events in Linux. So move to SCMI.
> > In the example, an SCMI server in OP-TEE world raises optee irq 5
> > so that Linux scmi optee channel &scmi_cpu_dvfs pushed in the incoming
> > SCMI message in the scmi device for liekly later processing in threaded
> > context. The example includes all parties: optee, scmi, sram, gic.
> > - Obviously rephrased the commit message.
> > - Added Cc: tags
> > ---
> > .../arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.yaml | 67 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.yaml
> > index d4dc0749f9fd..9c00c27f8b2c 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.yaml
> > @@ -40,6 +40,14 @@ properties:
> > HVC #0, register assignments
> > register assignments are specified in drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h
> >
> > + interrupt-controller: true
> > +
> > + "#interrupt-cells":
> > + const: 1
> > + description: |
> > + OP-TEE exposes irq for irp chip controllers from OP-TEE world. Each
> > + irq is assigned a single line number identifier used as first argument.
> > +
> > required:
> > - compatible
> > - method
> > @@ -64,3 +72,62 @@ examples:
> > method = "hvc";
> > };
> > };
> > +
> > + - |
> > + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> > + firmware {
> > + optee: optee {
> > + compatible = "linaro,optee-tz";
> > + method = "smc";
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 187 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + scmi {
> > + compatible = "linaro,scmi-optee";
> > + linaro,optee-channel-id = <0>;
> > + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + scmi_cpu_dvfs: protocol@13 {
> > + reg = <0x13>;
> > + linaro,optee-channel-id = <1>;
> > + shmem = <&scmi_shm_tx>, <&scmi_shm_rx>;
> > + interrupts-extended = <&optee 5>;
> > + interrupt-names = "a2p";
>
> These properties aren't documented. Soon there will be a warning[1].

They are.
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.1/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm%2Cscmi.yaml#L45-L53

In arm,scmi.yaml, interrupts optional property stands for interrupts
and interrupts-extended, no?


>
> > + #clock-cells = <1>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + gic: interrupt-controller@a0021000 {
> > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a7-gic";
> > + reg = <0xa0021000 0x1000>, <0xa0022000 0x2000>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + soc {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > + sram@2ffff000 {
> > + compatible = "mmio-sram";
> > + reg = <0x2ffff000 0x1000>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > + ranges = <0 0x2ffff000 0x1000>;
> > +
> > + scmi_shm_tx: scmi-sram@0 {
> > + compatible = "arm,scmi-shmem";
> > + reg = <0 0x80>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + scmi_shm_rx: scmi-sram@100 {
> > + compatible = "arm,scmi-shmem";
> > + reg = <0x100 0x80>;
> > + };
>
> There's no need to show providers in examples (unless the example is for
> the provider).

Ok, i'll simplify the example

Thanks,
Etienne

>
> Rob