[PATCH -next v2 3/3] blk-cgroup: synchronize pd_free_fn() from blkg_free_workfn() and blkcg_deactivate_policy()

From: Yu Kuai
Date: Wed Jan 18 2023 - 07:45:54 EST


From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>

Currently parent pd can be freed before child pd:

t1: remove cgroup C1
blkcg_destroy_blkgs
blkg_destroy
list_del_init(&blkg->q_node)
// remove blkg from queue list
percpu_ref_kill(&blkg->refcnt)
blkg_release
call_rcu

t2: from t1
__blkg_release
blkg_free
schedule_work
t4: deactivate policy
blkcg_deactivate_policy
pd_free_fn
// parent of C1 is freed first
t3: from t2
blkg_free_workfn
pd_free_fn

If policy(for example, ioc_timer_fn() from iocost) access parent pd from
child pd after pd_offline_fn(), then UAF can be triggered.

Fix the problem by delaying 'list_del_init(&blkg->q_node)' from
blkg_destroy() to blkg_free_workfn(), and use a new disk level mutex to
protect blkg_free_workfn() and blkcg_deactivate_policy).

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
block/blk-cgroup.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
include/linux/blkdev.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
index 75f3c4460715..4098e8030e01 100644
--- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
+++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
@@ -118,16 +118,26 @@ static void blkg_free_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct blkcg_gq *blkg = container_of(work, struct blkcg_gq,
free_work);
+ struct request_queue *q = blkg->q;
int i;

+ if (q)
+ mutex_lock(&q->blkcg_mutex);
+
for (i = 0; i < BLKCG_MAX_POLS; i++)
if (blkg->pd[i])
blkcg_policy[i]->pd_free_fn(blkg->pd[i]);

if (blkg->parent)
blkg_put(blkg->parent);
- if (blkg->q)
- blk_put_queue(blkg->q);
+
+ if (q) {
+ if (!list_empty(&blkg->q_node))
+ list_del_init(&blkg->q_node);
+ mutex_unlock(&q->blkcg_mutex);
+ blk_put_queue(q);
+ }
+
free_percpu(blkg->iostat_cpu);
percpu_ref_exit(&blkg->refcnt);
kfree(blkg);
@@ -462,9 +472,14 @@ static void blkg_destroy(struct blkcg_gq *blkg)
lockdep_assert_held(&blkg->q->queue_lock);
lockdep_assert_held(&blkcg->lock);

- /* Something wrong if we are trying to remove same group twice */
- WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&blkg->q_node));
- WARN_ON_ONCE(hlist_unhashed(&blkg->blkcg_node));
+ /*
+ * blkg is removed from queue list in blkg_free_workfn(), hence this
+ * function can be called from blkcg_destroy_blkgs() first, and then
+ * before blkg_free_workfn(), this function can be called again in
+ * blkg_destroy_all().
+ */
+ if (hlist_unhashed(&blkg->blkcg_node))
+ return;

for (i = 0; i < BLKCG_MAX_POLS; i++) {
struct blkcg_policy *pol = blkcg_policy[i];
@@ -478,8 +493,11 @@ static void blkg_destroy(struct blkcg_gq *blkg)

blkg->online = false;

+ /*
+ * Delay deleting list blkg->q_node to blkg_free_workfn() to synchronize
+ * pd_free_fn() from blkg_free_workfn() and blkcg_deactivate_policy().
+ */
radix_tree_delete(&blkcg->blkg_tree, blkg->q->id);
- list_del_init(&blkg->q_node);
hlist_del_init_rcu(&blkg->blkcg_node);

/*
@@ -1280,6 +1298,7 @@ int blkcg_init_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
int ret;

INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->blkg_list);
+ mutex_init(&q->blkcg_mutex);

new_blkg = blkg_alloc(&blkcg_root, disk, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!new_blkg)
@@ -1520,6 +1539,7 @@ void blkcg_deactivate_policy(struct request_queue *q,
if (queue_is_mq(q))
blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);

+ mutex_lock(&q->blkcg_mutex);
spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);

__clear_bit(pol->plid, q->blkcg_pols);
@@ -1538,6 +1558,7 @@ void blkcg_deactivate_policy(struct request_queue *q,
}

spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&q->blkcg_mutex);

if (queue_is_mq(q))
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index b87ed829ab94..53ae0a7fe377 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -485,6 +485,7 @@ struct request_queue {
DECLARE_BITMAP (blkcg_pols, BLKCG_MAX_POLS);
struct blkcg_gq *root_blkg;
struct list_head blkg_list;
+ struct mutex blkcg_mutex;
#endif

struct queue_limits limits;
--
2.31.1