On 11/3/22 13:50, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
Hi Rob,
On 02/11/2022 19:26, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:20:27PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
+
+ i2c-alias-pool:
Something common or could be? If not, then needs a vendor prefix.
I'll have to think about this. It is related to the i2c-atr, so I think
it might be a common thing.
I'd say this should be common. Where the i2c-atr properties should live
is another question though. If the I2C-atr stays as a genericly usable
component - then these bindings should be in a file that can be
referenced by other I2C-atr users (like the UB960 here).
// snip
Yes, I totally missed these.+
+ i2c-alias:
Vendor prefix.
+ description: |
+ The i2c address used for the serializer. Transactions
to this
+ address on the i2c bus where the deserializer resides are
+ forwarded to the serializer.
+
+ rx-mode:
Vendor prefix. And so on... >
I think the i2c-alias might need to be common as well?