Re: [PATCH v1.1 1/2] x86/sev: Use per-CPU PSC structure in prep for unaccepted memory support

[Dave Hansen]

On 8/3/22 11:21, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> Would it be simpler to just do a spin_trylock_irqsave()?  You fall back
>> to early_set_pages_state() whenever you can't acquire the lock.
> 
> I was looking at that and can definitely go that route if this approach
> is preferred.

I prefer it for sure.

This whole iteration does look good to me versus the per-cpu version, so
I say go ahead with doing this for v2 once you wait a bit for any more
feedback.