Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] Use lightweigt version of bpftool

[Quentin Monnet]

On 15/07/2022 17:56, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 7:16 PM Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Currently, samples/bpf, tools/runqslower and bpf/iterators use bpftool
>> for vmlinux.h, skeleton, and static linking only. We can uselightweight
>> bootstrap version of bpftool to handle these, and it will be faster.
>>
>> v2:
>> - make libbpf and bootstrap bpftool independent. and make it simple.
>>
> 
> Quentin, does this patch set look good to you?

[Apologies, the mail server has been filtering Pu's emails as spam for
some reason and I had missed the discussion :s]

Looks OK to me:
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Although I'm a bit sorry to see the sharing of libbpf between bpftool
and libbpf go away. But OK. We can maybe reintroduce it through
bpftool's Makefile or a separate include Makefile in the future.

Quentin