Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mfd: intel-lpss: Provide an SSP type to the SPI driver

From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Wed Jul 13 2022 - 12:10:50 EST


On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 02:12:27PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 09:10:06AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Sun, 03 Jul 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> > > > +static const struct property_entry spt_spi_properties[] = {
> > > > + PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("intel,spi-pxa2xx-type", LPSS_SPT_SSP),
> > > > + { }
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +static const struct software_node spt_spi_node = {
> > > > + .properties = spt_spi_properties,
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > static const struct intel_lpss_platform_info spt_info = {
> > > > .clk_rate = 120000000,
> > > > + .swnode = &spt_spi_node,
> > > > };
> > >
> > > IMHO, this is a rubbish interface.
> > >
> > > The amount of 10-line changes required to store a 32-bit value is
> > > depressing. Is there not a reduced interface for storing small pieces
> > > of data that doesn't require arrays of structs?
> >
> > The part of it that makes it longer because of differentiating the hardware,
> > but see the difference here:
> >
> > In this change:
> > 95 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> >
> > In the follow up SPI driver cleaning (not yet submitted):
> > 14 insertions(+), 121 deletions(-)
>
> Not sure we are understanding each other.
>
> The patch is fine. I'm referring to the software_node interface.

Ah, I see, sorry for the confusion.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko