Re: [PATCH V2] mm: prevent page_frag_alloc() from corrupting the memory

From: Alexander Duyck
Date: Wed Jul 13 2022 - 11:13:06 EST


On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 8:01 AM Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> A number of drivers call page_frag_alloc() with a
> fragment's size > PAGE_SIZE.
> In low memory conditions, __page_frag_cache_refill() may fail the order 3
> cache allocation and fall back to order 0;
> In this case, the cache will be smaller than the fragment, causing
> memory corruptions.
>
> Prevent this from happening by checking if the newly allocated cache
> is large enough for the fragment; if not, the allocation will fail
> and page_frag_alloc() will return NULL.
>
> V2: do not free the cache page because this could make memory pressure
> even worse, just return NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index e008a3df0485..b1407254a826 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5617,6 +5617,8 @@ void *page_frag_alloc_align(struct page_frag_cache *nc,
> /* reset page count bias and offset to start of new frag */
> nc->pagecnt_bias = PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE + 1;
> offset = size - fragsz;
> + if (unlikely(offset < 0))
> + return NULL;
> }
>
> nc->pagecnt_bias--;

This works for me. If I am not mistaken it should be only adding one
conditional jump that isn't taken to the fast path based on a
calculation we were already doing.

Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@xxxxxx>