Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: dvfs: Use MediaTek CPUFREQ HW as an example

From: Sudeep Holla
Date: Wed Jul 13 2022 - 10:42:57 EST


On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 08:45:40PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Qcom CPUFREQ HW don't have the support for generic performance domains yet.
> So use MediaTek CPUFREQ HW that has the support available in mainline.
>
> This also silences the below dtschema warnings for "cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml":
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dvfs/performance-domain.example.dt.yaml: performance-controller@12340000: reg: [[305397760, 4096]] is too short
> From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dvfs/performance-domain.example.dt.yaml: performance-controller@12340000: 'clocks' is a required property
> From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dvfs/performance-domain.example.dt.yaml: performance-controller@12340000: 'clock-names' is a required property
> From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dvfs/performance-domain.example.dt.yaml: performance-controller@12340000: '#freq-domain-cells' is a required property
> From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dvfs/performance-domain.example.dt.yaml: performance-controller@12340000: '#performance-domain-cells' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml
>
> Cc: Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>

Thanks for picking this up.

Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>

--
Regards,
Sudeep