Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: Add dedicated helper to get CPUID entry with significant index
From: Maxim Levitsky
Date: Tue Jul 12 2022 - 11:34:21 EST
On Tue, 2022-07-12 at 00:06 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Add a second CPUID helper, kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index(), to handle KVM
> queries for CPUID leaves whose index _may_ be significant, and drop the
> index param from the existing kvm_find_cpuid_entry(). Add a WARN in the
> inner helper, cpuid_entry2_find(), to detect attempts to retrieve a CPUID
> entry whose index is significant without explicitly providing an index.
>
> Using an explicit magic number and letting callers omit the index avoids
> confusion by eliminating the myriad cases where KVM specifies '0' as a
> dummy value.
>
> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> v2: Rebased to kvm/queue.
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211022002006.1425701-1-seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h | 16 ++++----
> arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 8 ++--
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 4 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/sgx.c | 8 ++--
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 6 +--
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +-
> 8 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index d47222ab8e6e..10247528b59b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -67,9 +67,17 @@ u32 xstate_required_size(u64 xstate_bv, bool compacted)
> #define F feature_bit
> #define SF(name) (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_##name) ? F(name) : 0)
>
> +/*
> + * Magic value used by KVM when querying userspace-provided CPUID entries and
> + * doesn't care about the CPIUD index because the index of the function in
> + * question is not significant. Note, this magic value must have at least one
> + * bit set in bits[63:32] and must be consumed as a u64 by cpuid_entry2_find()
> + * to avoid false positives when processing guest CPUID input.
> + */
> +#define KVM_CPUID_INDEX_NOT_SIGNIFICANT -1ull
>
> static inline struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *cpuid_entry2_find(
> - struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entries, int nent, u32 function, u32 index)
> + struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entries, int nent, u32 function, u64 index)
How I wish that this would be just called EAX and ECX... Anyway....
> {
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *e;
> int i;
> @@ -77,9 +85,22 @@ static inline struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *cpuid_entry2_find(
> for (i = 0; i < nent; i++) {
> e = &entries[i];
>
> - if (e->function == function &&
> - (!(e->flags & KVM_CPUID_FLAG_SIGNIFCANT_INDEX) || e->index == index))
> + if (e->function != function)
> + continue;
> +
> + /*
> + * If the index isn't significant, use the first entry with a
> + * matching function. It's userspace's responsibilty to not
> + * provide "duplicate" entries in all cases.
> + */
> + if (!(e->flags & KVM_CPUID_FLAG_SIGNIFCANT_INDEX) || e->index == index)
> return e;
> +
> + /*
> + * Function matches and index is significant; not specifying an
> + * exact index in this case is a KVM bug.
> + */
Nitpick: Why KVM bug? Bad userspace can also provide a index-significant entry for cpuid
leaf for which index is not significant in the x86 spec.
We could arrange a table of all known leaves and for each leaf if it has an index
in the x86 spec, and warn/reject the userspace CPUID info if it doesn't match.
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(index == KVM_CPUID_INDEX_NOT_SIGNIFICANT);
> }
>
> return NULL;
> @@ -96,7 +117,8 @@ static int kvm_check_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> * The existing code assumes virtual address is 48-bit or 57-bit in the
> * canonical address checks; exit if it is ever changed.
> */
> - best = cpuid_entry2_find(entries, nent, 0x80000008, 0);
> + best = cpuid_entry2_find(entries, nent, 0x80000008,
> + KVM_CPUID_INDEX_NOT_SIGNIFICANT);
OK.
> if (best) {
> int vaddr_bits = (best->eax & 0xff00) >> 8;
>
> @@ -151,7 +173,7 @@ static void kvm_update_kvm_cpuid_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> vcpu->arch.kvm_cpuid_base = 0;
>
> for_each_possible_hypervisor_cpuid_base(function) {
> - entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, function, 0);
> + entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, function);
KVM leaves have no index indeed.
TIL: I didn't knew that KVM leaves can be offset like that.
>
> if (entry) {
> u32 signature[3];
> @@ -177,7 +199,8 @@ static struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *__kvm_find_kvm_cpuid_features(struct kvm_vcpu *v
> if (!base)
> return NULL;
>
> - return cpuid_entry2_find(entries, nent, base | KVM_CPUID_FEATURES, 0);
> + return cpuid_entry2_find(entries, nent, base | KVM_CPUID_FEATURES,
> + KVM_CPUID_INDEX_NOT_SIGNIFICANT);
Same.
> }
>
> static struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *kvm_find_kvm_cpuid_features(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -219,7 +242,7 @@ static void __kvm_update_cpuid_runtime(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_cpuid_e
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best;
> u64 guest_supported_xcr0 = cpuid_get_supported_xcr0(entries, nent);
>
> - best = cpuid_entry2_find(entries, nent, 1, 0);
> + best = cpuid_entry2_find(entries, nent, 1, KVM_CPUID_INDEX_NOT_SIGNIFICANT);
Leaf 1, no index indeed.
Offtopic: I wonder why we call this 'best'?
> if (best) {
> /* Update OSXSAVE bit */
> if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVE))
> @@ -250,7 +273,7 @@ static void __kvm_update_cpuid_runtime(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_cpuid_e
> best->eax &= ~(1 << KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT);
>
> if (!kvm_check_has_quirk(vcpu->kvm, KVM_X86_QUIRK_MISC_ENABLE_NO_MWAIT)) {
> - best = cpuid_entry2_find(entries, nent, 0x1, 0);
> + best = cpuid_entry2_find(entries, nent, 0x1, KVM_CPUID_INDEX_NOT_SIGNIFICANT);
> if (best)
> cpuid_entry_change(best, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT,
> vcpu->arch.ia32_misc_enable_msr &
Leaf 1 again, OK.
> @@ -285,7 +308,7 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best;
> u64 guest_supported_xcr0;
>
> - best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 1, 0);
> + best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 1);
Leaf 1 again, OK.
> if (best && apic) {
> if (cpuid_entry_has(best, X86_FEATURE_TSC_DEADLINE_TIMER))
> apic->lapic_timer.timer_mode_mask = 3 << 17;
> @@ -325,10 +348,10 @@ int cpuid_query_maxphyaddr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best;
>
> - best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x80000000, 0);
> + best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x80000000);
Leaf 0x80000000, OK.
> if (!best || best->eax < 0x80000008)
> goto not_found;
> - best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x80000008, 0);
> + best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x80000008);
Leaf 0x80000000, OK.
> if (best)
> return best->eax & 0xff;
> not_found:
> @@ -1302,12 +1325,20 @@ int kvm_dev_ioctl_get_cpuid(struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid,
> return r;
> }
>
> -struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *kvm_find_cpuid_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> - u32 function, u32 index)
> +struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + u32 function, u32 index)
Nitpick: could you fix the indention while at it?
> {
> return cpuid_entry2_find(vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries, vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent,
> function, index);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index);
> +
> +struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *kvm_find_cpuid_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + u32 function)
> +{
> + return cpuid_entry2_find(vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries, vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent,
> + function, KVM_CPUID_INDEX_NOT_SIGNIFICANT);
> +}
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_find_cpuid_entry);
>
> /*
> @@ -1344,7 +1375,7 @@ get_out_of_range_cpuid_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *fn_ptr, u32 index)
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *basic, *class;
> u32 function = *fn_ptr;
>
> - basic = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0, 0);
> + basic = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0);
Leaf 0, OK.
> if (!basic)
> return NULL;
>
> @@ -1353,11 +1384,11 @@ get_out_of_range_cpuid_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *fn_ptr, u32 index)
> return NULL;
>
> if (function >= 0x40000000 && function <= 0x4fffffff)
> - class = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, function & 0xffffff00, 0);
> + class = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, function & 0xffffff00);
> else if (function >= 0xc0000000)
> - class = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0xc0000000, 0);
> + class = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0xc0000000);
> else
> - class = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, function & 0x80000000, 0);
> + class = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, function & 0x80000000);
This assumes that all the classes has first entry whose EAX specifies max leaf
for this class. True for sure for basic and extended features, don't know
if true for hypervisor and Centaur entries. Seems OK.
>
> if (class && function <= class->eax)
> return NULL;
> @@ -1375,7 +1406,7 @@ get_out_of_range_cpuid_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *fn_ptr, u32 index)
> * the effective CPUID entry is the max basic leaf. Note, the index of
> * the original requested leaf is observed!
> */
> - return kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, basic->eax, index);
> + return kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index(vcpu, basic->eax, index);
> }
>
> bool kvm_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *eax, u32 *ebx,
> @@ -1385,7 +1416,7 @@ bool kvm_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *eax, u32 *ebx,
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry;
> bool exact, used_max_basic = false;
>
> - entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, function, index);
> + entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index(vcpu, function, index);
> exact = !!entry;
>
> if (!entry && !exact_only) {
> @@ -1414,7 +1445,7 @@ bool kvm_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *eax, u32 *ebx,
> * exists. EDX can be copied from any existing index.
> */
> if (function == 0xb || function == 0x1f) {
> - entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, function, 1);
> + entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index(vcpu, function, 1);
> if (entry) {
> *ecx = index & 0xff;
> *edx = entry->edx;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> index ac72aabba981..b1658c0de847 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> @@ -13,8 +13,10 @@ void kvm_set_cpu_caps(void);
>
> void kvm_update_cpuid_runtime(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_update_pv_runtime(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + u32 function, u32 index);
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *kvm_find_cpuid_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> - u32 function, u32 index);
> + u32 function);
> int kvm_dev_ioctl_get_cpuid(struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid,
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 __user *entries,
> unsigned int type);
> @@ -76,7 +78,7 @@ static __always_inline u32 *guest_cpuid_get_register(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> const struct cpuid_reg cpuid = x86_feature_cpuid(x86_feature);
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry;
>
> - entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, cpuid.function, cpuid.index);
> + entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index(vcpu, cpuid.function, cpuid.index);
> if (!entry)
> return NULL;
>
> @@ -109,7 +111,7 @@ static inline bool guest_cpuid_is_amd_or_hygon(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best;
>
> - best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0, 0);
> + best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0);
OK
> return best &&
> (is_guest_vendor_amd(best->ebx, best->ecx, best->edx) ||
> is_guest_vendor_hygon(best->ebx, best->ecx, best->edx));
> @@ -119,7 +121,7 @@ static inline bool guest_cpuid_is_intel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best;
>
> - best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0, 0);
OK
> + best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0);
> return best && is_guest_vendor_intel(best->ebx, best->ecx, best->edx);
> }
>
> @@ -127,7 +129,7 @@ static inline int guest_cpuid_family(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best;
>
> - best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x1, 0);
OK
> + best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x1);
> if (!best)
> return -1;
>
> @@ -138,7 +140,7 @@ static inline int guest_cpuid_model(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best;
>
> - best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x1, 0);
OK
> + best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x1);
> if (!best)
> return -1;
>
> @@ -154,7 +156,7 @@ static inline int guest_cpuid_stepping(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best;
>
> - best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x1, 0);
OK
> + best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x1);
> if (!best)
> return -1;
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> index e2e95a6fccfd..ed804447589c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> @@ -1992,7 +1992,7 @@ void kvm_hv_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry;
> struct kvm_vcpu_hv *hv_vcpu;
>
> - entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, HYPERV_CPUID_INTERFACE, 0);
> + entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, HYPERV_CPUID_INTERFACE);
None of HV cpuids have index, so all look OK.
> if (entry && entry->eax == HYPERV_CPUID_SIGNATURE_EAX) {
> vcpu->arch.hyperv_enabled = true;
> } else {
> @@ -2005,7 +2005,7 @@ void kvm_hv_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> hv_vcpu = to_hv_vcpu(vcpu);
>
> - entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, HYPERV_CPUID_FEATURES, 0);
> + entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, HYPERV_CPUID_FEATURES);
> if (entry) {
> hv_vcpu->cpuid_cache.features_eax = entry->eax;
> hv_vcpu->cpuid_cache.features_ebx = entry->ebx;
> @@ -2016,7 +2016,7 @@ void kvm_hv_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> hv_vcpu->cpuid_cache.features_edx = 0;
> }
>
> - entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, HYPERV_CPUID_ENLIGHTMENT_INFO, 0);
> + entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, HYPERV_CPUID_ENLIGHTMENT_INFO);
> if (entry) {
> hv_vcpu->cpuid_cache.enlightenments_eax = entry->eax;
> hv_vcpu->cpuid_cache.enlightenments_ebx = entry->ebx;
> @@ -2025,7 +2025,7 @@ void kvm_hv_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> hv_vcpu->cpuid_cache.enlightenments_ebx = 0;
> }
>
> - entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, HYPERV_CPUID_SYNDBG_PLATFORM_CAPABILITIES, 0);
> + entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, HYPERV_CPUID_SYNDBG_PLATFORM_CAPABILITIES);
> if (entry)
> hv_vcpu->cpuid_cache.syndbg_cap_eax = entry->eax;
> else
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index 37ce061dfc76..d2fa008b04ad 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -4193,7 +4193,7 @@ static void svm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> /* For sev guests, the memory encryption bit is not reserved in CR3. */
> if (sev_guest(vcpu->kvm)) {
> - best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x8000001F, 0);
> + best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x8000001F);
> if (best)
> vcpu->arch.reserved_gpa_bits &= ~(1UL << (best->ebx & 0x3f));
OK.
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> index 53ccba896e77..4bc098fbec31 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> pmu->pebs_enable_mask = ~0ull;
> pmu->pebs_data_cfg_mask = ~0ull;
>
> - entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0xa, 0);
> + entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0xa);
OK
> if (!entry || !vcpu->kvm->arch.enable_pmu)
> return;
> eax.full = entry->eax;
> @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> pmu->global_ovf_ctrl_mask &=
> ~MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL_TRACE_TOPA_PMI;
>
> - entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 7, 0);
> + entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index(vcpu, 7, 0);
> if (entry &&
> (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HLE) || boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RTM)) &&
> (entry->ebx & (X86_FEATURE_HLE|X86_FEATURE_RTM))) {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/sgx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/sgx.c
> index 35e7ec91ae86..d1cc7244bede 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/sgx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/sgx.c
> @@ -148,8 +148,8 @@ static int __handle_encls_ecreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> u8 max_size_log2;
> int trapnr, ret;
>
> - sgx_12_0 = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x12, 0);
> - sgx_12_1 = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x12, 1);
> + sgx_12_0 = kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index(vcpu, 0x12, 0);
> + sgx_12_1 = kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index(vcpu, 0x12, 1);
> if (!sgx_12_0 || !sgx_12_1) {
> kvm_prepare_emulation_failure_exit(vcpu);
> return 0;
> @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static bool sgx_intercept_encls_ecreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.sgx_provisioning_allowed)
> return true;
>
> - guest_cpuid = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x12, 0);
> + guest_cpuid = kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index(vcpu, 0x12, 0);
> if (!guest_cpuid)
> return true;
>
> @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static bool sgx_intercept_encls_ecreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (guest_cpuid->ebx != ebx || guest_cpuid->edx != edx)
> return true;
>
> - guest_cpuid = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x12, 1);
> + guest_cpuid = kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index(vcpu, 0x12, 1);
> if (!guest_cpuid)
> return true;
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index c30115b9cb33..74ca64e97643 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -7428,7 +7428,7 @@ static void nested_vmx_cr_fixed1_bits_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> vmx->nested.msrs.cr4_fixed1 |= (_cr4_mask); \
> } while (0)
>
> - entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x1, 0);
> + entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x1);
OK.
> cr4_fixed1_update(X86_CR4_VME, edx, feature_bit(VME));
> cr4_fixed1_update(X86_CR4_PVI, edx, feature_bit(VME));
> cr4_fixed1_update(X86_CR4_TSD, edx, feature_bit(TSC));
> @@ -7444,7 +7444,7 @@ static void nested_vmx_cr_fixed1_bits_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> cr4_fixed1_update(X86_CR4_PCIDE, ecx, feature_bit(PCID));
> cr4_fixed1_update(X86_CR4_OSXSAVE, ecx, feature_bit(XSAVE));
>
> - entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x7, 0);
> + entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index(vcpu, 0x7, 0);
> cr4_fixed1_update(X86_CR4_FSGSBASE, ebx, feature_bit(FSGSBASE));
> cr4_fixed1_update(X86_CR4_SMEP, ebx, feature_bit(SMEP));
> cr4_fixed1_update(X86_CR4_SMAP, ebx, feature_bit(SMAP));
> @@ -7479,7 +7479,7 @@ static void update_intel_pt_cfg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < PT_CPUID_LEAVES; i++) {
> - best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x14, i);
> + best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index(vcpu, 0x14, i);
> if (!best)
> return;
> vmx->pt_desc.caps[CPUID_EAX + i*PT_CPUID_REGS_NUM] = best->eax;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 567d13405445..329875d2ccf2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -11731,7 +11731,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
> * i.e. it's impossible for kvm_find_cpuid_entry() to find a valid entry
> * on RESET. But, go through the motions in case that's ever remedied.
> */
> - cpuid_0x1 = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 1, 0);
> + cpuid_0x1 = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 1);
OK.
> kvm_rdx_write(vcpu, cpuid_0x1 ? cpuid_0x1->eax : 0x600);
>
> static_call(kvm_x86_vcpu_reset)(vcpu, init_event);
>
> base-commit: b9b71f43683ae9d76b0989249607bbe8c9eb6c5c
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky