Re: [PATCH v3 09/25] KVM: VMX: nVMX: Support TSC scaling and PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL with enlightened VMCS

From: Maxim Levitsky
Date: Tue Jul 12 2022 - 07:54:47 EST

Next message: Maxim Levitsky: "Re: [PATCH v3 10/25] KVM: selftests: Enable TSC scaling in evmcs selftest"
Previous message: Maxim Levitsky: "Re: [PATCH v3 08/25] KVM: selftests: Switch to updated eVMCSv1 definition"
In reply to: Vitaly Kuznetsov: "[PATCH v3 09/25] KVM: VMX: nVMX: Support TSC scaling and PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL with enlightened VMCS"
Next in thread: Vitaly Kuznetsov: "[PATCH v3 11/25] KVM: VMX: Get rid of eVMCS specific VMX controls sanitization"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 16:42 +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Enlightened VMCS v1 got updated and now includes the required fields
> for TSC scaling and loading PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL upon VMENTER/VMEXIT
> features. For Hyper-V on KVM enablement, KVM can just observe VMX control
> MSRs and use the features (with or without eVMCS) when
> possible. Hyper-V on KVM case is trickier because of live migration:
> the new features require explicit enablement from VMM to not break
> it. Luckily, the updated eVMCS revision comes with a feature bit in
> CPUID.0x4000000A.EBX.

Very tiny nitpick about the commit summary. It might make sense instead
of specifying which new fields added, just say that this patch
updates the EVMCS to 2022 revision, or something, because the patch
series as a whole addes some other fields (even if as commented out),
and a new cpuid bit to detect the new eVMCS revision.

Again, this is a very tiny nitpick, feel free to ignore.

>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h | 17 ++------
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> index b666902da4d9..406c5e273983 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> @@ -2562,7 +2562,7 @@ int kvm_get_hv_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid,
> case HYPERV_CPUID_NESTED_FEATURES:
> ent->eax = evmcs_ver;
> ent->eax |= HV_X64_NESTED_MSR_BITMAP;
> -
> + ent->ebx |= HV_X64_NESTED_EVMCS1_2022_UPDATE;
> break;
>
> case HYPERV_CPUID_SYNDBG_VENDOR_AND_MAX_FUNCTIONS:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
> index 8bea5dea0341..52a53debd806 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
> @@ -368,7 +368,60 @@ uint16_t nested_get_evmcs_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -void nested_evmcs_filter_control_msr(u32 msr_index, u64 *pdata)
> +enum evmcs_v1_revision {
> + EVMCSv1_2016,
> + EVMCSv1_2022,
> +};
> +
> +enum evmcs_unsupported_ctrl_type {
> + EVMCS_EXIT_CTLS,
> + EVMCS_ENTRY_CTLS,
> + EVMCS_2NDEXEC,
> + EVMCS_PINCTRL,
> + EVMCS_VMFUNC,
> +};
> +
> +static u32 evmcs_get_unsupported_ctls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + enum evmcs_unsupported_ctrl_type ctrl_type)
Tiny nitpick: line break not aligned in the above.

> +{
> + struct kvm_vcpu_hv *hv_vcpu = to_hv_vcpu(vcpu);
> + enum evmcs_v1_revision evmcs_rev = EVMCSv1_2016;
> +
> + if (!hv_vcpu)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (hv_vcpu->cpuid_cache.nested_ebx & HV_X64_NESTED_EVMCS1_2022_UPDATE)
> + evmcs_rev = EVMCSv1_2022;
> +
> + switch (ctrl_type) {
> + case EVMCS_EXIT_CTLS:
> + if (evmcs_rev == EVMCSv1_2016)
> + return EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMEXIT_CTRL |
> + VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL;
> + else
> + return EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMEXIT_CTRL;
> + case EVMCS_ENTRY_CTLS:
> + if (evmcs_rev == EVMCSv1_2016)
> + return EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMENTRY_CTRL |
> + VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL;
> + else
> + return EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMENTRY_CTRL;
> + case EVMCS_2NDEXEC:
> + if (evmcs_rev == EVMCSv1_2016)
> + return EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_2NDEXEC |
> + SECONDARY_EXEC_TSC_SCALING;
> + else
> + return EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_2NDEXEC;
> + case EVMCS_PINCTRL:
> + return EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_PINCTRL;
> + case EVMCS_VMFUNC:
> + return EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMFUNC;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void nested_evmcs_filter_control_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr_index, u64 *pdata)
> {
> u32 ctl_low = (u32)*pdata;
> u32 ctl_high = (u32)(*pdata >> 32);
> @@ -380,72 +433,73 @@ void nested_evmcs_filter_control_msr(u32 msr_index, u64 *pdata)
> switch (msr_index) {
> case MSR_IA32_VMX_EXIT_CTLS:
> case MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_EXIT_CTLS:
> - ctl_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMEXIT_CTRL;
> + ctl_high &= ~evmcs_get_unsupported_ctls(vcpu, EVMCS_EXIT_CTLS);
> break;
> case MSR_IA32_VMX_ENTRY_CTLS:
> case MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_ENTRY_CTLS:
> - ctl_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMENTRY_CTRL;
> + ctl_high &= ~evmcs_get_unsupported_ctls(vcpu, EVMCS_ENTRY_CTLS);
> break;
> case MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2:
> - ctl_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_2NDEXEC;
> + ctl_high &= ~evmcs_get_unsupported_ctls(vcpu, EVMCS_2NDEXEC);
> break;
> case MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_PINBASED_CTLS:
> case MSR_IA32_VMX_PINBASED_CTLS:
> - ctl_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_PINCTRL;
> + ctl_high &= ~evmcs_get_unsupported_ctls(vcpu, EVMCS_PINCTRL);
> break;
> case MSR_IA32_VMX_VMFUNC:
> - ctl_low &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMFUNC;
> + ctl_low &= ~evmcs_get_unsupported_ctls(vcpu, EVMCS_VMFUNC);
> break;
> }
>
> *pdata = ctl_low | ((u64)ctl_high << 32);
> }
>
> -int nested_evmcs_check_controls(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
> +int nested_evmcs_check_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> u32 unsupp_ctl;
>
> unsupp_ctl = vmcs12->pin_based_vm_exec_control &
> - EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_PINCTRL;
> + evmcs_get_unsupported_ctls(vcpu, EVMCS_PINCTRL);
> if (unsupp_ctl) {
> trace_kvm_nested_vmenter_failed(
> - "eVMCS: unsupported pin-based VM-execution controls",
> + "eVMCS: unsupported pin-based VM-execution controls: ",
> unsupp_ctl);
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
>
> unsupp_ctl = vmcs12->secondary_vm_exec_control &
> - EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_2NDEXEC;
> + evmcs_get_unsupported_ctls(vcpu, EVMCS_2NDEXEC);
> if (unsupp_ctl) {
> trace_kvm_nested_vmenter_failed(
> - "eVMCS: unsupported secondary VM-execution controls",
> + "eVMCS: unsupported secondary VM-execution controls: ",
> unsupp_ctl);
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
>
> unsupp_ctl = vmcs12->vm_exit_controls &
> - EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMEXIT_CTRL;
> + evmcs_get_unsupported_ctls(vcpu, EVMCS_EXIT_CTLS);
> if (unsupp_ctl) {
> trace_kvm_nested_vmenter_failed(
> - "eVMCS: unsupported VM-exit controls",
> + "eVMCS: unsupported VM-exit controls: ",
> unsupp_ctl);
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
>
> unsupp_ctl = vmcs12->vm_entry_controls &
> - EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMENTRY_CTRL;
> + evmcs_get_unsupported_ctls(vcpu, EVMCS_ENTRY_CTLS);
> if (unsupp_ctl) {
> trace_kvm_nested_vmenter_failed(
> - "eVMCS: unsupported VM-entry controls",
> + "eVMCS: unsupported VM-entry controls: ",
> unsupp_ctl);
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - unsupp_ctl = vmcs12->vm_function_control & EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMFUNC;
> + unsupp_ctl = vmcs12->vm_function_control &
> + evmcs_get_unsupported_ctls(vcpu, EVMCS_VMFUNC);
> if (unsupp_ctl) {
> trace_kvm_nested_vmenter_failed(
> - "eVMCS: unsupported VM-function controls",
> + "eVMCS: unsupported VM-function controls: ",
> unsupp_ctl);
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h
> index f886a8ff0342..4b809c79ae63 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h
> @@ -37,16 +37,9 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(enable_evmcs);
> * EPTP_LIST_ADDRESS = 0x00002024,
> * VMREAD_BITMAP = 0x00002026,
> * VMWRITE_BITMAP = 0x00002028,
> - *
> - * TSC_MULTIPLIER = 0x00002032,
> * PLE_GAP = 0x00004020,
> * PLE_WINDOW = 0x00004022,
> * VMX_PREEMPTION_TIMER_VALUE = 0x0000482E,
> - * GUEST_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL = 0x00002808,
> - * HOST_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL = 0x00002c04,
> - *
> - * Currently unsupported in KVM:
> - * GUEST_IA32_RTIT_CTL = 0x00002814,
> */
> #define EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_PINCTRL (PIN_BASED_POSTED_INTR | \
> PIN_BASED_VMX_PREEMPTION_TIMER)
> @@ -58,12 +51,10 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(enable_evmcs);
> SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_PML | \
> SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_VMFUNC | \
> SECONDARY_EXEC_SHADOW_VMCS | \
> - SECONDARY_EXEC_TSC_SCALING | \
> SECONDARY_EXEC_PAUSE_LOOP_EXITING)
> #define EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMEXIT_CTRL \
> - (VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL | \
> - VM_EXIT_SAVE_VMX_PREEMPTION_TIMER)
> -#define EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMENTRY_CTRL (VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL)
> + (VM_EXIT_SAVE_VMX_PREEMPTION_TIMER)
> +#define EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMENTRY_CTRL (0)
> #define EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMFUNC (VMX_VMFUNC_EPTP_SWITCHING)
>
> struct evmcs_field {
> @@ -243,7 +234,7 @@ bool nested_enlightened_vmentry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *evmcs_gpa);
> uint16_t nested_get_evmcs_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int nested_enable_evmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> uint16_t *vmcs_version);
> -void nested_evmcs_filter_control_msr(u32 msr_index, u64 *pdata);
> -int nested_evmcs_check_controls(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12);
> +void nested_evmcs_filter_control_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr_index, u64 *pdata);
> +int nested_evmcs_check_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12);
>
> #endif /* __KVM_X86_VMX_EVMCS_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index 4fc84f0f5875..dcf3ee645212 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -2891,7 +2891,7 @@ static int nested_vmx_check_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.enlightened_vmcs_enabled)
> - return nested_evmcs_check_controls(vmcs12);
> + return nested_evmcs_check_controls(vcpu, vmcs12);
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index c30115b9cb33..b4915d841357 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -1858,7 +1858,7 @@ static int vmx_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> */
> if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
> vmx->nested.enlightened_vmcs_enabled)
> - nested_evmcs_filter_control_msr(msr_info->index,
> + nested_evmcs_filter_control_msr(vcpu, msr_info->index,
> &msr_info->data);
> break;
> case MSR_IA32_RTIT_CTL:

Looks all good.

Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx>

Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky

Next message: Maxim Levitsky: "Re: [PATCH v3 10/25] KVM: selftests: Enable TSC scaling in evmcs selftest"
Previous message: Maxim Levitsky: "Re: [PATCH v3 08/25] KVM: selftests: Switch to updated eVMCSv1 definition"
In reply to: Vitaly Kuznetsov: "[PATCH v3 09/25] KVM: VMX: nVMX: Support TSC scaling and PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL with enlightened VMCS"
Next in thread: Vitaly Kuznetsov: "[PATCH v3 11/25] KVM: VMX: Get rid of eVMCS specific VMX controls sanitization"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]